Greenlytes Lab Learn before you buy.
Editorial Policy

How we turn research into useful guidance.

Our editorial policy explains how Greenlytes Lab chooses topics, checks technical claims, writes practical guidance, handles commercial context and keeps published guides useful over time.

Applies to Greenlytes Lab guides
Last updated August 2026
01
Purpose

We start with a decision the reader actually needs to make.

Greenlytes Lab focuses on practical questions around outdoor solar lighting: how much light is appropriate, how beam shape affects coverage, how solar charging conditions affect performance, where fixtures are best placed and what trade-offs matter for a particular use.

A guide should leave the reader with a clearer understanding of the subject and a useful next step. We do not publish a topic simply to fill a keyword gap or make the library appear larger.

Our test: Would this page still be useful to someone who arrived directly, without coming from a search engine?
02
Research

We match the research to the claim.

Not every sentence requires a citation, but technical claims should be supported at the level appropriate to the subject. Depending on the guide, research may include manufacturer documentation, government or institutional material, technical standards, recognized industry references and product specifications.

We prefer primary or authoritative sources when they are available and relevant. Secondary sources can be useful for context, but they should not replace a stronger original source merely because they are easier to quote.

Relevance — does the source actually support the claim being made?

Authority — is there a more direct or authoritative source available?

Context — are limitations, assumptions or product-specific conditions being preserved?

03
Writing & review

Technical detail has to earn its place on the page.

We write for readers who want to understand a practical lighting problem, not for specialists trying to decode unnecessary jargon. Technical terms are used when they improve precision and explained when a reader should not be expected to know them.

Tables, examples, diagrams and interactive tools are included when they make a decision easier to understand. They should not be added merely to make a guide look more comprehensive.

Before publication, a guide is reviewed for internal consistency, clarity, source alignment, links, obvious factual errors and whether its recommendations are framed with the right level of certainty.

04
Sources

Readers should be able to see what important claims rest on.

When a guide relies on external technical sources, we identify those sources in the article. The goal is not to attach a citation to every ordinary statement, but to make consequential factual claims traceable where doing so helps the reader evaluate the guidance.

Product specifications can change. For installation requirements, electrical limits, operating modes, warranty conditions or other product-specific instructions, the current manufacturer documentation takes priority over general guidance on Greenlytes Lab.

05
Commercial context

Greenlytes is a retailer, and we do not hide that relationship.

Greenlytes sells outdoor solar-lighting products. Some Greenlytes Lab guides therefore link naturally to Greenlytes product categories or products when those links provide a useful next step.

That commercial context should not change the technical explanation. A guide may explain that a product type is a poor fit for a particular use, that a higher specification is unnecessary, or that performance depends on conditions a buyer needs to consider before purchasing.

Principle: Education comes first. A commercial link should follow the guidance, not determine it.
06
Updates

Published does not mean forgotten.

Greenlytes Lab guides are intended to remain useful after publication. We may update them when technical guidance changes, sources become outdated, links stop working, explanations can be materially improved, or new information changes the practical answer.

The visible “Updated” date should represent a meaningful editorial revision, not a cosmetic date refresh made only to make an older page appear recent.

07
Corrections

When something is wrong, the priority is to fix the page.

If we identify a factual error, misleading explanation, broken reference or recommendation that no longer reflects the evidence, we correct the affected content. Significant revisions should also be reflected in the page’s update information where appropriate.

Readers who notice an issue can use the Greenlytes contact channel to flag it for review. A correction request is evaluated against the underlying evidence rather than accepted or rejected simply because it favors Greenlytes.

Continue exploring

The policy supports the guides. The guides do the useful work.